
|
Theo Clarke has added The Honorary Consul as Already read
|
|
Theo Clarke has added Cider with Rosie as Already read
|
|
Theo Clarke has added Cider with Rosie: A boyhood in the west of England (Time reading program special edition) as Already read
|
|
Theo Clarke has reviewed The Dante Trap
![]() |
|
Theo Clarke has reviewed Secret History
|
|
Theo Clarke has reviewed The Secret History
|
Moira: Thank you for your comments. I estimate that I have read about 13,000 discrete books in full.The reason for marking multiple editions is that ReadingSocial does not aggregate editions into single works in the way that one sees on LibraryThing. I have asked HungryMachine to add this feature. Meanwhile, if I want to see what all readers are saying about a work, I have to have selected that work in all its forms. In general, I only tick editions that have already been added by others. I would guess that on average a single work appears in about three editions so I have probably only listed about 15% of my reading here. If my policy offends you, I am sorry, and I would welcome any suggestions of ways to use this app as I wish without inflating my shelf.
This is a great collection. We share a lot of the same tastes in authors. My only quibble is that you have a lot of duplication. Some titles appear 4 or more times.
Benjamin: I would say that Where The Wild Things Are would be on my list of essential reading (were I to have one). I do wish that the application would identify unique works rather than treating every different edition as a separate thing. For example, would my review of the paperback edition of Making Money be any different had I read it in hardcover?
Sasi: I read everything; even cereal packets. As well as fiction I read a lot of history and topography but almost anything can catch my attention.
I am impressed , do you read just fiction or any subject ? some how I personally feel fiction is just like watching movie and a waste of time, what do you think about it?
noticed that you have counted some books more than once! i would say one per page, which suggests 10 percent! but who am I to say, my collection stands at a mere 194...haha... would adjust your figures to about 5900... and really does Where The Wild Things Are count?.... which reminds me, must add it... Great Book... you must have struggled through it after Foucault.
Set in Venice in 1756 this novel is a pretty straightforward international conspiracy wrapped around a very nasty series of murderous set pieces based on Dante's twelve circles of Hell. The first few chapters were very hard going but the middle of the book made it all worthwhile before a rather hasty and unremarkable denouement. Part of the problem is that the characters are only lightly personalised and the language is rather rococo. Eventually, however, I became accustomed to the baroque style and the shallow characterisation. Once I was able to distinbguish the various characters I could enjoy the absurd theatricality of the murders and accept the justification for this extremity. I was, however disappointed by the sudden and predictable course ofv the last three murders and their ultimate solution.
Literate crime novel which purports to be about regret but is more about the demise of friendship under stress. The young protagonists that murder a friend after the unconvincing accidental killing of a stranger are all in the throes of various psychoses that are not made explicit. The narrator is at the heart of things but feels little remorse for their chrime and seems to regret only the loss of his friends. These characteristics diminish a novel that is richly textured and easy to read, which is an extraordinarily difficult achievement. I enjoyed the read but was left mildly dissatisfied when it was over.
Literate crime novel which purports to be about regret but is more about the demise of friendship under stress. The young protagonists that murder a friend after the unconvincing accidental killing of a stranger are all in the throes of various psychoses that are not made explicit. The narrator is at the heart of things but feels little remorse for their chrime and seems to regret only the loss of his friends. These characteristics diminish a novel that is richly textured and easy to read, which is an extraordinarily difficult achievement. I enjoyed the read but was left mildly dissatisfied when it was over.
This is hardly a book worth publishing. The list makes a fun web page and anybody can look up the words that they do not know in an ordinary dictionary.
This third novel in the Morse series has the culturally acute detective enter the world of academic examinations boards, in which the author worked. A deaf exam setter is murdered and, after some hefty hints as to the morderer's identity, Morse tries to identify which of a limited set of suspects is guilty. When the board's female secretary is attacked, Morse's protective feelings are roused. THe solution of the mystery is entwined with Morse's romantic response to the secretary, and a parallel mystery about a breach of examination security. For all Morse's circumlocutions, and deductive errors, the pace is fast and the characters' conversations are rich in this satisfying mystery novel.
This third novel in the Morse series has the culturally acute detective enter the world of academic examinations boards, in which the author worked. A deaf exam setter is murdered and, after some hefty hints as to the morderer's identity, Morse tries to identify which of a limited set of suspects is guilty. When the board's female secretary is attacked, Morse's protective feelings are roused. THe solution of the mystery is entwined with Morse's romantic response to the secretary, and a parallel mystery about a breach of examination security. For all Morse's circumlocutions, and deductive errors, the pace is fast and the characters' conversations are rich in this satisfying mystery novel.