Much Ado About Nothing by William Shakespeare

Much Ado About Nothing

William Shakespeare

clear rating

Folger Shakespeare Library

The world's leading center for Shakespeare studies

Each edition includes:

• Freshly edited text based on the best earlyprinted version of the play

• Full explanatory notes conveniently placed on pages facing the text of the play

• Scene-by-scene plot summaries

• A key to famous lines and phrases

• An introduction to reading Shakespeare's language

• An essay by an outstanding scholar providing a modern perspective on the play

&#... (show more)

Reviews (1158)

Quote-leftInteresting plot, but nowhere near as good as A Midsummer Nights Dream last year. All the class stuff to do with it was pretty boring as well. This pathetic play got me a frickin detention !@#$Quote-right

Quote-leftHilarious in performance. Check out Kenneth Braugham's film; it's fantastic. Mostly. I could've done without the greased-up Keanu.Quote-right

Quote-leftMy favorite Shakespeare comedy, second favorite Shakespeare. Definitely worth reading, and even better seeing if it's a good cast.Quote-right

Quote-leftMy favorite Shakespeare play. Not entirely crazy, kind of humorous, still follows Shakespeare's usual lead.Quote-right

Quote-leftMy favorite play of Shakespeare's. Very cute. Dogberry is one of the funniest characters in Shakespeare, hands down.Quote-right

Quote-leftTwo sets of loves, one tricked into and the other tricked out of - the schemes both work, to their extents. It is, basically, much ado about nothing.Quote-right

Quote-leftI have been unfaithful to Arkangel. I was quite enjoying their presentation, particularly with the excellent Saskia Reeves as Beatrice, but I kept on thinking back to the cinema version of 1993, which I remember with deep nostalgia because it was the year we got married; and eventually I thought, OK, I'll get hold of the Branagh version and watch it instead. Which was surprisingly easy, and definitely worth it.
The play itself is genuinely funny, not quite as funny as A Comedy of Errors, but a better play - the characters are better rounded, and the drama frankly more believable. Beatrice is surely one of the most memorable female roles in Shakespeare (I think only Portia is in the same league). I see from IMDB that her role was played by Penelope Keith in the 1978 BBC version, and by Maggie Smith in a 1967 version which also starred Caroline "Liz Shaw" John as Hero. But the overall frame is good too, the contrast between the Claudia/Hero and Beatrice/Benedick romances, neither of which is straightforward, but complicated in different ways. The Dogberry bits are, for once, pretty integral to the plot, though I suspect it is difficult to integrate them with satisfactory unity of style. (If I were staging it, I'd have Dogberry's guards and maybe even Dogberyy himself visible in the background in all the early crowd scenes, so that they don't appear out of nowhere in Act III.)Quote-right

Quote-leftNorthanger Abbey is one I just recently finished. It is written a little differently than some of Austen's other works it is still a great read.Quote-right

Quote-leftOk, I know I said I loved Midsummer Night's Dream, but honestly this one is my favorite (except for the ass part in the other one--I could really relate to that.) Oh and then there's The Taming of the Shrew...Quote-right

Quote-leftShakespeare is forced into being accepted by every high school student, which they condemn for their obscurity. That's really a shame, because as exemplified by this play, the stories are at times hilarious and overall superbly told.Quote-right

Image Gallery (44)