A staggeringly popular work of fiction, Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code has stood atop The New York Times Bestseller List for well over a year, with millions of copies in print. But this fast-paced mystery is unusual in that the author states up front that the historical information in the book
is all factually accurate. But is this claim true?
As historian Bart D. Ehrman shows in this informative and witty book, The Da Vinci Code is filled with numerous historical mistakes. Did the anc... (show more)
Had a hard time reading this one...kept thinking "blah, blah, blah". I read the DaVinci Code to be entertained, not for historical accuracy! Interesting if you want other points of view...
Anybody that has read the Da Vinci Code has to read this to understand how much bullshit Dan Brown is capable of: and I'm an atheist.
I enjoyed this book, even if it is a short collection of perspectives spanning almost every other book and article he has ever written and contributed. It is a good starting point for those who became interested in New Testament studies and textual criticism because of the Da Vinci code. Not recommended for serious students.